On April 25th, a class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against Transamerica Life Insurance Company. The suit was filed on behalf of an insured, her daughter, and “all others similarly situated” who were affected “by an unlawful and excessive increase in their monthly deduction rates.”
The suit notes that Transamerica announced an increase in monthly deduction rates of “as much as 38% for certain universal life insurance policies.” (NOTE: In an earlier blog [see: Transamerica Cost of Insurance Increases: Is the Other Shoe Now Dropping?], ITM TwentyFirst documented a Transamerica deduction increase of almost 100%.) The suit goes on to say that the increase “forces a Hobson’s Choice on policyholders: either pay exorbitant premiums that cannot be justified by the ultimate death benefits of the policy, or just surrender the policy and walk away from years of premium payments.”
The policy in question is a $500,000 TransMax Survivor policy issued in May of 1991. The policy is subject to a monthly deduction rate increase of 21%, which was spelled out in a letter received in March of 2016 by the policy’s owner/beneficiary (the insured’s daughter).
As in the previous case filed in California against Transamerica (see: Consumer Group Files Suit Against Transamerica for Cost of Insurance Increases), the suit references the guaranteed crediting rate on the policy. This suit alleges that Transamerica breached the contract terms with the policy increase “in order to avoid its obligation to credit the guaranteed interest rates under the policies” and noted “Transamerica’s investment returns are insufficient to support the policies’ guaranteed 5.5% rate” and they are attempting to offset the guarantee “through higher monthly deductions taken from the policyholders’ accumulation accounts.”
As also alleged in the previous suit, this suit maintains that Transamerica, by raising deductions, was attempting to entice policy holders to drop their coverage, to “shed policies by making the premium payments cost-prohibitive for policyholders.”
The class action lawsuit is open to both California and non-California residents, though some aspects of the case are relevant only to California residents, including an action for a violation of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act.
The action seeks the reinstatement of all policies “cancelled or surrendered as a result of the rate increase” and calls for “enjoining Transamerica, its representatives and agents, from using monthly deduction rates based on the rate increase and from charging excessive monthly deduction rates.”
We at ITM TwentyFirst will be tracking this case. For a copy of the lawsuit, email mbrohawn@itm21st.com
By |2016-04-27T11:34:34+00:00April 27th, 2016|Categories: Current Assumption Universal Life, General Interest, Policy Management|8 Comments

About the Author:

8 Comments

  1. Doug Neill April 27, 2016 at 3:34 pm - Reply

    Most of the industry,except the pure mutuals that still exist, are facing similar pressures to raise COI’s as this is the only aspect remaining to try to bring these policies back to profitability. Interest rates , for the most part, are already at their contractual minimums (mortality, lapsation and surrenders, premium payment patterns and account accumulation,etc.).
    The SOA is applying pressure to recognize real world values of these policies and adjust their GAAP assets based on true “policyholder behavior”.
    Some very poor product designs invited “arbitrage” for those who were able to take advantage of them and now these policies are causing losses to be recognized which were ignored for years. Many games were played. Companies are reaping what they sowed.
    Innocent buyers are being hurt and their backlash will bring this to light.

  2. Doug Neill April 27, 2016 at 3:43 pm - Reply

    The editing system jumbled some of the above. Policy holder behavior refers to mortality, lapsation and surrenders, premium payment patterns and account accumulation. Sorry if there is any confusion.

  3. mbrohawn April 28, 2016 at 8:15 am - Reply

    Thanks, Doug. No doubt a perfect “bad” storm is occurring. The question is, when will the pressure be off the carriers? Not being political in a political year, but it seems the governments (esp. in Europe) are raising capital requirements at the same time they are squashing rates. Not a great combination for the carriers.

  4. Thom Kondas July 5, 2016 at 1:02 pm - Reply

    How can I add my name to the law suit. Heads they win, tails they win. Capitalism sucks and we are the slaves.

  5. […] a second California lawsuit, Thompson v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company (see: Another Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Transamerica for Cost Increases); and one originally filed in the Southern District of Florida (see: Preliminary Injunction Motion […]

  6. Scott Gardiner November 18, 2016 at 3:32 pm - Reply

    How can I join the class action suit? I have a similar policy.

    • Scott Gardiner November 18, 2016 at 3:52 pm - Reply

      How can I join the suit?

  7. mavis merriweather December 3, 2016 at 11:54 am - Reply

    How can I join lawsuit

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.
%d bloggers like this: